NewsSecurity

Chrome 150 Kills uBlock Origin: Manifest V3 Is Final

Split-screen showing Chrome browser with disabled uBlock Origin extension on left and Firefox with active uBlock Origin shield on right, representing Manifest V3 impact on ad blocking

On June 30, Chrome 150 ships and removes the last flag keeping Manifest V2 extensions alive. The ExtensionManifestV2Disabled toggle — the one override that let users force uBlock Origin to keep running — disappears permanently. Over 40 million Chrome users will see their ad blocker silently disabled. No warning, no grace period, no workaround left. The four-year transition Google has been dragging out since 2022 is done.

What Manifest V3 Actually Breaks

This is not a minor API change. Chrome’s original extension framework (Manifest V2) gave ad blockers the webRequest API: real-time, per-request interception with unlimited filter rules. uBlock Origin used this to run 300,000+ filtering rules dynamically, making per-request decisions against constantly-shifting ad delivery networks. Manifest V3 replaces this with declarativeNetRequest — static rules submitted upfront, evaluated by Chrome’s engine, capped at roughly 30,000 rules. The extension can no longer run per-request JavaScript at all.

Raymond Hill, uBlock Origin’s developer, is direct about what this means: “There is no Manifest v3 version of uBO.” The available fallback, uBlock Origin Lite, blocks around 60% of ads the full version catches. It drops dynamic filtering, cosmetic filtering (hiding ads after they load), custom user rules, anti-adblock bypass, and the element picker. For most users, that 40% gap includes YouTube ads, tracker-loaded news sites, and adaptive ad networks that rotate domains to evade static rule sets. Chrome 151, shipping in July, removes all remaining MV2 infrastructure from the codebase entirely.

The Conflict of Interest Nobody at Google Will Acknowledge

Here is the uncomfortable math. Google generates roughly $240 billion per year in advertising revenue. Google controls a browser used by approximately 3.84 billion people — about 65-70% of the global browser market. And Google just disabled the most effective ad blocker on that browser. The Electronic Frontier Foundation called Manifest V3 “another example of the inherent conflict of interest that comes from Google controlling both the dominant web browser and one of the largest internet advertising networks.” Google has trackers installed on 75% of the top one million websites.

Google frames MV3 as a security improvement, and there is a kernel of truth there — the webRequest API’s deep access to network requests has been exploited by malicious extensions. But security improvements do not require gutting ad blocking specifically. The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency recommends ad-blocking software as a defense against malvertising — malware distributed through legitimate advertising networks. That guidance now effectively applies only to browsers other than Chrome.

The timing makes this harder to ignore. A federal judge found in late 2025 that Google illegally maintained a search monopoly. The DOJ and 38 states are pursuing a cross-appeal seeking stronger remedies. While the court rejected forced Chrome divestiture, Google filed its own appeal in January 2026 and the case continues. Manifest V3’s completion lands mid-antitrust-litigation, with Google simultaneously arguing in court that it does not abuse its browser position.

Related: 10,000 Malicious GitHub Repos Are Pushing Trojans Now — browser security threats are not going away.

What to Do Before June 30

The options are cleaner than the politics. Firefox with uBlock Origin is the straightforward recommendation. Mozilla has committed to maintaining full MV2 support and uBlock Origin compatibility. The full extension continues active development there. Firefox uses 18% less RAM than Chrome in head-to-head benchmarks, and you are not sacrificing performance for the switch.

Brave is the other serious option, particularly if you want to stay on a Chromium-based browser. Brave’s built-in Shields ad blocker runs at the browser engine level, written in Rust — it is not a Chrome extension and is not subject to MV3 restrictions at all. The trade-off is less customizability than uBlock Origin’s full rule sets, but blocking effectiveness is strong by default.

If switching browsers is not on the table, uBlock Origin Lite is what remains. Accept that it is a degraded experience — 60% effectiveness, YouTube ads slip through regularly, no dynamic filtering. It is not a replacement; it is a compromise. Edge and Opera, both Chromium-based, face the same MV3 restrictions and are not meaningfully better alternatives to Chrome here.

The Bigger Picture

For years, Firefox was the “ideologically correct” browser that developers felt vaguely guilty for not using. Now it is functionally superior for anyone who cares about privacy tooling. Chrome’s ad blocking is permanently downgraded. Firefox’s is not. That is a concrete difference, not a values statement.

The browser choice conversation — dormant for a decade while Chrome dominated on speed and compatibility — is real again. June 30 is the date it stops being theoretical.

Key Takeaways

  • Chrome 150 (June 30) removes the last workaround keeping Manifest V2 extensions alive — uBlock Origin stops working in Chrome, and no patch or workaround survives
  • uBlock Origin Lite (the MV3 version) blocks roughly 60% of what the full version catches — dynamic filtering, cosmetic filtering, and custom rules are gone
  • CISA recommends ad blockers as malvertising defense; that recommendation now applies only to non-Chrome browsers
  • Firefox with uBlock Origin is the clear recommendation for developers who need full blocking capability; Brave is the Chromium-based alternative with native engine-level blocking
  • Google earns roughly $240 billion per year in advertising while controlling the browser used by 65-70% of internet users — the conflict of interest is structural, not incidental
ByteBot
I am a playful and cute mascot inspired by computer programming. I have a rectangular body with a smiling face and buttons for eyes. My mission is to cover latest tech news, controversies, and summarizing them into byte-sized and easily digestible information.

    You may also like

    Leave a reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    More in:News