Internet Archive Storage Costs: Beats AWS $2M/Month

The Internet Archive stores 200 petabytes of data—enough to preserve humanity’s digital history—for less than what AWS charges to store 100 petabytes for a year. AWS S3 would cost $2.1 million per month for 100PB storage alone. That’s $25.2 million annually, roughly equal to the Archive’s entire operating budget (staff, facilities, hardware, legal defense—everything). They run 28,000 spinning disks across 750 servers, cooled by San Francisco fog instead of air conditioning, powered entirely by open-source software. As 80% of organizations plan cloud repatriation in 2026, the Internet Archive proves owned infrastructure can slash costs 10-100x for massive-scale storage.

Cloud vendors don’t want you doing this math. However, with companies wasting 30-35% of cloud budgets and repatriation saving millions, it’s time engineers understand when owned infrastructure beats cloud economics.

PetaBox Architecture: Fog Cooling and Open Source

The PetaBox isn’t exotic enterprise storage—it’s cleverly engineered commodity hardware. Current racks hold 1.4 petabytes each (up from 100TB in 2004), using standard 8-22TB consumer drives you’d buy for a NAS. Fourth-generation specs: 240 disks per 4U rack mount, Intel Xeon processors, 12GB RAM, bonded gigabit networking, all running Ubuntu Linux. No proprietary storage appliances. No vendor lock-in. Just smart engineering at scale.

The breakthrough is efficiency, not hardware. San Francisco’s fog provides ambient cooling—zero air conditioning costs. Moreover, the Archive captures 60+ kilowatts of waste heat and recirculates it to warm the building during winter. No software licensing fees burden the budget (Ubuntu plus custom open-source management stack). Furthermore, geographic redundancy spans 4 data centers across 3 countries (California, Netherlands, Egypt, Canada), using drive-level mirroring rather than expensive centralized SANs. Each petabyte requires just one system administrator.

The cost differential is staggering. AWS S3 charges $0.021 per GB monthly. For 100 petabytes (100 million GB), that’s $2.1 million per month or $25.2 million annually—before data egress fees, API requests, or management overhead. The Internet Archive’s entire annual budget ($25-30M) covers 200PB storage plus all operations. Consequently, owned infrastructure delivers roughly 10x cost efficiency: estimated $50K-100K per petabyte annually (hardware amortized over 5 years plus power/cooling) versus AWS’s $252K per petabyte.

This isn’t theoretical savings—it’s the difference between viable preservation and financial impossibility.

Cloud Repatriation: The 2026 Wave

The Internet Archive isn’t alone. 80% of organizations plan cloud repatriation in 2026—the highest rate on record. This isn’t cloud abandonment; it’s maturation. Companies are learning which workloads belong in cloud (elastic, unpredictable) versus on-premises (steady-state, cost-sensitive).

Three case studies prove the model: 37signals saved $10M over 5 years ($2M annually) leaving AWS. Dropbox cut $74.6M in 2 years by building own infrastructure ($39.5M in year one alone). GEICO is moving 50% of Azure workloads to private OpenStack cloud by 2029, achieving 50-60% cost reductions on compute and storage.

Data egress fees create cloud lock-in by design. When 37signals exited AWS, the company waived $250,000 in egress fees—a hidden tax on leaving that grows with dataset size. Moving just 1 petabyte from AWS S3 costs $90K-120K in egress charges alone. Therefore, the bigger your data, the more expensive it is to leave, even when monthly storage costs are unsustainable. This is vendor lock-in disguised as convenience.

The trend validates what the Internet Archive has known for two decades: “cloud-first” isn’t always “cloud-best.” Understanding break-even points and total cost of ownership is now a critical engineering skill.

When to Own Infrastructure vs. Cloud Storage

Break-even timeline: 15 months for typical steady-state workloads. After that, owned infrastructure becomes increasingly cost-effective every year. However, workload characteristics determine everything.

Cloud wins for unpredictable or bursty traffic, small scale (under 2TB), short-term projects (under 18 months), need for elastic scaling, or lack of in-house expertise. You’re paying for flexibility and managed services. That has value—when you actually need those features.

In contrast, owned infrastructure dominates for predictable steady growth, large scale (10TB+), long-term commitment (5+ years), storage-heavy workloads (archival, backup, content delivery), and data sovereignty requirements. At 2TB storage, cloud pricing tiers triple or quadruple costs. For 6TB+ needs, break-even hits at 18 months. The Internet Archive represents the extreme: at 200PB scale, owned infrastructure breaks even in under 12 months and delivers 10x savings thereafter.

The smart play for most organizations: hybrid strategies. Run baseline loads on owned hardware, burst to cloud during spikes. You get cost savings from owned infrastructure plus elasticity from cloud. Best of both worlds, none of the religious wars over “cloud-only” versus “on-premises forever.”

Read more: Kubernetes Memory Waste: 68% of Pods Over-Provision 3-8x

Trade-Offs: Capital, Complexity, and Cooling

Owned infrastructure isn’t free money. The challenges are real: high upfront capital expenditure (CapEx versus cloud’s OpEx model), operational complexity requiring staff for hardware maintenance and disaster recovery, no elastic scaling for instant capacity additions, procurement delays (weeks or months versus cloud’s instant provisioning), and geographic limitations.

That last point is critical. Internet Archive’s fog cooling only works in San Francisco’s maritime climate. Elsewhere, traditional HVAC costs negate much of the savings. The Hacker News community noted the Archive’s power efficiency is “extremely poor compared to enterprise storage” in conventional data centers. The San Francisco premium (real estate, labor) and cooling uniqueness mean this exact model isn’t universally replicable.

Additionally, organizations face capital budget approval hurdles (harder than operational expenses) and scarcity of in-house talent to manage petabyte-scale hardware. Most cloud-native teams lack the expertise to run on-premises infrastructure at scale. That’s not a knock on cloud skills—it’s recognizing that owning hardware requires different capabilities.

Before cargo-culting the Internet Archive model, understand what makes it work for them: predictable 25% annual storage growth, unique San Francisco climate, nonprofit status with donor capital funding, and deep in-house expertise built over 20 years.

The Shift to Cloud-Smart Infrastructure

The lesson isn’t “cloud is bad” or “everyone should own servers.” It’s that blind “cloud-first” strategies leave millions on the table. 2026 marks the shift from “lift-and-shift everything” to strategic workload placement.

Cloud excels for dynamic, unpredictable workloads requiring global distribution and managed services. Owned infrastructure dominates for steady-state, storage-heavy, long-term use cases where break-even economics matter. The Internet Archive proves the extreme: 200PB for $25M annually versus AWS’s $50M+ theoretical cost. That’s not marginal optimization—it’s existential for preservation budgets.

70% of enterprises now embrace hybrid cloud strategies, moving away from all-or-nothing approaches. FinOps adoption hits 75% in 2026 as cost optimization becomes standard practice. Nevertheless, the trend is “cloud-smart”: right workload, right infrastructure, data-driven decisions rather than vendor dogma.

For developers making infrastructure decisions in 2026: challenge your assumptions. “Because AWS/Azure/GCP” isn’t strategy—it’s laziness. Understanding total cost of ownership, break-even points, and workload characteristics separates engineers who optimize costs from those who blindly follow trends. The Internet Archive’s fog-cooled PetaBox servers prove that sometimes the best cloud strategy is no cloud at all.

Key Takeaways

• AWS S3 costs $2.1M/month for 100PB storage; Internet Archive runs 200PB for $25M annually total
• Owned infrastructure breaks even at 15 months for steady-state workloads above 10TB
• 80% of companies plan cloud repatriation in 2026 (37signals: $10M saved, Dropbox: $74M, GEICO: 50-60% reduction)
• Cloud wins for elastic/unpredictable workloads; owned wins for steady-state storage at scale
• Hybrid strategies (owned baseline + cloud burst) deliver best economics for most enterprises
• Data egress fees ($90K-120K per petabyte) create cloud vendor lock-in by design
• PetaBox architecture: 1.4PB/rack, fog cooling, open-source stack, zero software licensing fees

Read more: Platform Engineering 80% Adoption: 70% Fail Within 18 Months