By ByteBot
On November 18, 2025, Google launched Antigravity, an agentic development platform that shifts AI coding from copilot suggestions to autonomous agent execution. Moreover, powered by Gemini 3 Pro and Flash, Antigravity gives AI agents direct control over the editor, terminal, and browser to autonomously plan, execute, and verify coding tasks—challenging Cursor’s $29.3 billion valuation and GitHub Copilot’s enterprise dominance with a free tier strategy. However, the paradigm shift is real. The execution? Not so much.
From Copilots to Agents: The Fundamental Shift
Traditional AI coding tools like GitHub Copilot suggest code line-by-line while you type. In contrast, Cursor offers fast autocomplete and multi-file refactors. Antigravity throws out that playbook entirely. Its agents autonomously control the editor, terminal, and browser, planning multi-step tasks and self-validating their work without constant human input.
Furthermore, developers can dispatch five agents simultaneously in the Manager View—one refactoring code, another optimizing performance, a third running security audits—all working in parallel. Notably, one developer built a complete Android APK in 30 minutes with “only a handful of prompt revisions” and “zero manual code review,” according to hands-on testing. Additionally, on SWE-bench Verified—a benchmark measuring whether AI can resolve real GitHub issues in production codebases—Antigravity hit 76.2%.
Consequently, this shifts developer workflows from synchronous (human writes code with AI suggestions) to asynchronous (AI handles tasks while human oversees). Multi-agent parallelization could genuinely multiply productivity. If the platform worked reliably.
The Free Tier Play: Google vs Cursor’s Billion-Dollar Business
Google is undercutting Cursor’s paid model with a free tier strategy. Currently, Cursor charges $20/month for Pro and crossed $1 billion in annualized revenue with a $29.3 billion valuation as of November 2025. Antigravity? Free for individuals in public preview, offering generous rate limits on Gemini 3 Pro plus support for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and OpenAI GPT-4o.
Essentially, this is a classic land-grab play. Hook developers on agentic coding before introducing paid tiers, likely tied to Google Cloud. The problem? No pricing roadmap exists. No timeline was announced. “There’s zero chance it stays free at volume long-term,” according to pricing analysis, but nobody knows where it’ll settle.
Therefore, developers are nervous about building critical workflows on uncertain foundations—especially given Google’s history of abandoning products. Reader. Google+. Inbox. Stadia. Meanwhile, Cursor’s $1 billion ARR proves developers will pay for stable, polished tools with transparent pricing. Antigravity’s free tier doesn’t inspire trust without commitment.
Severe Technical Problems: Rate Limits, Login Failures, Model Bugs
Despite the compelling vision, Antigravity suffers from catastrophic technical issues. Specifically, the biggest problem: rate limits so severe users hit quota “after a single query” or 2-3 prompts—even on paid Google AI Pro plans—with five-hour lockouts between resets. Additionally, login failures prevent access entirely. “Antigravity Unable to Sign In” is the most common complaint, according to troubleshooting guides.
Furthermore, there’s Gemini 3 Pro’s unreliability. The model gets stuck in loops, rewrites entire codebases while ignoring errors, or pauses mid-task randomly. “The consensus among early adopters is that Antigravity feels like a ‘20% time project’ rather than a polished product ready to compete,” DevClass reported. Consequently, until Google resolves login issues, clarifies its quota system, and fixes model-breaking bugs, it’ll struggle to win over developers.
Indeed, speed ratings reflect this gap: Cursor leads with 4.7/5 for rapid development workflows, Antigravity scores 4.4/5 when functional, and GitHub Copilot 4.3/5 for enterprise stability. Reliability separates production tools from experiments. Cursor’s $1 billion revenue proves it.
Antigravity vs Cursor vs GitHub Copilot: Which to Choose?
Each tool serves different use cases based on priority trade-offs. Specifically, Antigravity is ideal for hobbyists, students, and side projects where the free tier matters more than reliability. In contrast, Cursor leads for professional developers prioritizing speed and UX polish in rapid prototyping workflows. Meanwhile, GitHub Copilot dominates enterprise environments requiring SOC 2 Type II compliance, IP indemnity, and deep GitHub ecosystem integration.
For example, enterprise teams deploying AI coding tools should follow a hybrid approach, according to ITECS analysis: GitHub Copilot Enterprise for production development requiring compliance documentation and audit trails. Cursor licenses for rapid prototyping and internal tools. Antigravity pilots with 2-3 senior developers on non-critical projects.
However, Google acknowledges “known security limitations” including data exfiltration risks. Agents have access to code, local files, terminals, and browsers. Moreover, the platform lacks extensive third-party audits and certifications that financial regulators require. Until then, GitHub Copilot Enterprise or established platforms with proven SOC 2 attestations remain the conservative choice.
Key Takeaways
- Google’s agentic paradigm is genuinely innovative—multi-agent workflows and autonomous execution could multiply developer productivity when agents work in parallel without constant oversight
- Free tier undercuts Cursor’s $20/month model, but severe technical problems (rate limits after 2-3 prompts, login failures, unreliable Gemini 3 Pro) make it unusable for many developers
- Cursor’s proven business model ($1B ARR, $29.3B valuation) contrasts sharply with Google’s uncertain pricing and history of abandoning products (Reader, Google+, Inbox, Stadia)
- Use Antigravity for experiments and side projects, Cursor for professional development work prioritizing speed, GitHub Copilot for enterprise teams requiring compliance and ecosystem integration
- Antigravity could be transformational—if Google fixes reliability, clarifies long-term commitment, and delivers on the free tier promise without surprise pricing changes
Read more about Google’s official Antigravity announcement and hands-on developer reviews.
—
